Skip to content
BugRepellent.Guide
Heretic Parfum The Entomologist Insect Repellent Spray

Heretic Parfum

The Entomologist Insect Repellent Spray

Spray · Marketed as 'EPA-compliant' natural repellent, consistent with FIFRA 25(b) minimum-risk exemption (not EPA-registered)

Not recommendedFormula not fully disclosed · No proven mosquito protection
Best for: Natural & plant-basedBest for: Beauty & lifestyle

Retailer links may earn us a commission. Scores are never affected.

Pros

  • A complex, perfume-grade botanical blend that genuinely smells like a fragrance, not bug spray.

Cons

  • Concentrations are undisclosed, and there's no proven repellency.
  • A dense mix of geranium, cinnamon, and clove oils makes it one of the more sensitizing options.
  • Likely not built to EPA repellent standards.

The full review

Pitched as a wearable functional fragrance, this eight-oil blend is not recommended as protection. With no concentrations disclosed, coverage cannot be modeled and the effectiveness pillar bottoms out, while the brand's own once-an-hour reapplication advice signals how briefly it works. The evidence is soft, with 2 of 6 audited claims weak, though cedarwood oil does carry decent published support. Safety is the larger concern, driven by a high sensitization risk from geranium oil, high irritation from thyme oil, and a pregnancy caution, with a dense mix of clove and cinnamon adding to the load. Publishing the full formula earns transparency credit, yet without any quantified strength it is appealing as a perfume and unproven as a repellent.

Scorecard

Expand any pillar to see exactly why it scored what it did.

Effectiveness45%10

Mosquitoes: protection cannot be modeled because the active concentration is undisclosed. Ticks: protection cannot be modeled because the active concentration is undisclosed. Protection times are modeled from the actives, concentration, and format (see methodology). Scored on a saturating curve (each added hour counts less than the last), 65% mosquito / 35% tick, with lower confidence.

Mosquitoes: protection cannot be modeled because the active concentration is undisclosed. Ticks: protection cannot be modeled because the active concentration is undisclosed. Protection times are modeled from the actives, concentration, and format (see methodology). Scored on a saturating curve (each added hour counts less than the last), 65% mosquito / 35% tick, with lower confidence.

Evidence & honest claims25%39

Cedarwood oil is well-supported by published evidence, weighted by how close its concentration is to the studied effective dose (base 43). Of 6 marketing claims audited: 2 strong, 2 moderate, 2 weak, 0 unsupported (-4).

Cedarwood oil is well-supported by published evidence, weighted by how close its concentration is to the studied effective dose (base 43). Of 6 marketing claims audited: 2 strong, 2 moderate, 2 weak, 0 unsupported (-4).

Safety15%60

From published dermal toxicology (EPA/CIR/IFRA), scaled by each active's concentration against its leave-on limit: high skin-sensitization risk from Geranium oil (−18); high irritation risk from Thyme oil (−12); caution advised in pregnancy (−6); moderate aquatic toxicity (−4).

From published dermal toxicology (EPA/CIR/IFRA), scaled by each active's concentration against its leave-on limit: high skin-sensitization risk from Geranium oil (−18); high irritation risk from Thyme oil (−12); caution advised in pregnancy (−6); moderate aquatic toxicity (−4).

Transparency15%45

This product publishes an ingredient list (+20); discloses 0% of active concentrations (+0); discloses 0% of all ingredient concentrations (+0); the full formula including inerts is accounted for (+25).

This product publishes an ingredient list (+20); discloses 0% of active concentrations (+0); discloses 0% of all ingredient concentrations (+0); the full formula including inerts is accounted for (+25).

Every pillar is scored from published rules. Read how we score.

How long it protects

Complete protection ends when the first bite gets through; partial protection keeps reducing bites as repellency decays. EPA label times are verified; the rest are modeled from the actives, concentration, and format.

Mosquitoesno estimate
Ticksno estimate
0h2h4h6h8h10h12h
Complete protection Best case (range top) Partial protection (decaying) Minimal / unproven
Mosquito estimate basis (low confidence)

No protection time estimated — this product's label doesn't disclose the active ingredient's concentration, and protection depends on both the ingredient and its strength.

Tick estimate basis (low confidence)

No protection time estimated — this product's label doesn't disclose the active ingredient's concentration, and protection depends on both the ingredient and its strength.

Ingredient disclosure

This product publishes an ingredient list (+20); discloses 0% of active concentrations (+0); discloses 0% of all ingredient concentrations (+0); the full formula including inerts is accounted for (+25).

Active ingredient concentrations are not published for this product.

  • Cedarwood oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Clove oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Rosemary oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Geranium oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Thyme oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Lemongrass oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Peppermint oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Cinnamon oil

    Active repellent (botanical) · concentration not disclosed

    Active
  • Organic non-GMO sugarcane alcohol

    Carrier · concentration not disclosed

  • Eugenol

    Naturally derived fragrance component (from clove oil) · concentration not disclosed

  • Water

    Carrier · concentration not disclosed

Claims audit

What the marketing says, versus what the evidence supports.

  • Recommended reapplication once every hour

    DurationWeak

    Brand instructs reapplying 'once every hour'; implies short protection duration. No tested hours figure published.

  • No phthalates, parabens, synthetic dyes, or formaldehyde; vegan and cruelty-free

    SafetyModerate

    Per manufacturer ingredient disclosure and marketing.

  • 100% natural or naturally-derived ingredients (per ISO 9235)

    NaturalStrong

    Brand discloses every ingredient and cites the ISO 9235 natural aromatic raw materials standard.

  • Blend of essential oils proven to repel mosquitoes and other biting insects

    EfficacyWeak

    The individual oils have documented repellency in lab studies, but no product-level efficacy or duration testing is published, and the brand's own hourly-reapplication advice implies short protection.

  • EPA-compliant minimum-risk formulation

    OtherModerate

    Marketed as 'EPA-compliant'; the ingredient set is consistent with FIFRA 25(b), but the brand does not publish active-ingredient percentages in its online copy as 25(b) labels require on-pack.

  • DEET-free, 100% natural plant-based formula

    Deet FreeStrong

    Full ingredient list discloses only botanical oils, sugarcane alcohol, and water.

How to apply it

Spray onto exposed skin (and can be worn anywhere as a fragrance) before going outdoors. Because the formula contains none of the long-lasting registered actives, the brand recommends reapplying approximately once every hour while outside. Avoid eyes and broken skin as with any alcohol-based spray; no child-specific directions are provided by the manufacturer.

Worth comparing