Skip to content
BugRepellent.Guide

Study summary

Efficacy of some wearable devices compared with spray-on insect repellents for Aedes aegypti

Rodriguez SD, Chung H-N, Gonzales KK, et al.

Study type
Lab
Year
2017
Species tested
Aedes aegypti
Published in
Journal of Insect Science 17(1):46
Evidence strength
Well-supported evidence

How it was tested

Laboratory comparison of wearable repellent devices against spray-on repellents using human bait trials.

Summary

Wind-tunnel attraction-inhibition assays comparing five spray-on repellents against wearable bracelets, a sonic device, a clip-on, and a citronella candle for reducing Aedes aegypti attraction.

Key findings

All five sprays significantly reduced mosquito attraction; sprays with DEET (98%) and oil of lemon eucalyptus/PMD (30%) were the most effective. Of the wearables, only the metofluthrin clip-on worked; bracelets, the sonic device, and the citronella candle were no different from no repellent.

Limitations

Laboratory wind-tunnel attraction metric rather than bite-protection time; single species; products tested at one distance.

Related on this site

Read the original paper ↗