Skip to content
BugRepellent.Guide

Study summary

Repellent activity of essential oils to the Lone Star tick, Amblyomma americanum

Le Mauff A, Norris EJ, Li AY, Swale DR

Study type
Lab
Year
2024
Published in
Parasites & Vectors 17:202
Evidence strength
Limited evidence

Summary

Compares the same botanical oils across three assays (contact filter-paper, spatial glass-tube, and in-vivo fingertip skin) against lone star tick nymphs, exposing how poorly lab bioassays predict skin protection.

Key findings

Clove and geranium oils gave ~90% repellency in the contact filter-paper assay, but neither was significantly repellent in the fingertip (skin) assay (only patchouli was). Contact and skin results were negatively correlated, so high climbing-assay percentages do not translate to real on-skin bite protection.

Limitations

Lone star tick nymphs only; short observation windows; no full skin CPT time-course. Its value is the direct demonstration that contact bioassays overstate skin protection.

Related on this site

Read the original paper ↗