Skip to content
BugRepellent.Guide

Study summary

Novel arthropod repellent, BioUD (2-undecanone), is an efficacious alternative to DEET

Witting-Bissinger BE, Stumpf CF, Donohue KV, Apperson CS, Roe RM

Read the original paper
Study type
Lab
Year
2008
Published in
Journal of Medical Entomology 45(5):891-898
Evidence strength
Well-supported evidence

How it was tested

Laboratory and field comparison of BioUD (2-undecanone) against DEET-based products on human volunteers.

Summary

An NC State study introducing BioUD, whose active 2-undecanone comes from wild tomato, arguing that at 7.75% it matches or beats DEET against mosquitoes and ticks despite carrying far less active. It spans lab cage assays, tick choice tests, and human field trials.

Key findings

In the lab, 7.75% BioUD matched 7 to 15% DEET against Aedes mosquitoes over six hours, and in the field it equalled or beat 25 to 30% DEET. Against ticks it repelled for at least 2.5 hours on skin, and in a choice test ticks actually preferred DEET-treated surfaces over BioUD. The important caveat is that 2-undecanone was developed and patented at NC State, where the authors work, so this is essentially the institution validating its own product.

Limitations

No sample sizes in the abstract, mostly low-concentration DEET comparators in the controlled assays, qualitative repellency rather than protection times, and a clear institutional conflict of interest.

Related on this site

Read the original paper and see its figures ↗